The Social Interpretation (Al-Tafsir)in) Salafi Thought (Ibn Taymiyyah as a Model)

This research examines social(Al-Tafsir). interpretation as a modern exegetical methodology and compares it with the Salafi methodology as represented by Ibn Taymiyyah. The research concludes that social interpretation is a practical, ijtihadi (independent reasoning) methodology that draws inspiration from the Qur'an for solutions to societal issues and civilizational advancement. It is characterized by the use of contemporary language, utilization of modern sciences, attention to context, and the avoidance of Isra'iliyyat (narrations of Judeo-Christian origin).



In contrast, Ibn Taymiyyah's Salafi methodology relies on tafsir bil-ma'thur (interpretation based on transmitted tradition) and establishes the understanding of the early Muslim generations (al-salaf) as the supreme frame of reference. The research reveals a gap between theory and practice in Ibn Taymiyyah's approach, as he practically engages in ijtihad despite his warnings against tafsir bil-ra'y (interpretation based on personal opinion).



The two methodologies differ fundamentally in their ultimate aims: while social interpretation focuses on addressing societal issues, Ibn Taymiyyah's concern is centered on theological polemics and defending Salafi doctrine. They also differ in their frame of reference; Ibn Taymiyyah makes the understanding of the salaf the governing authority over language, whereas social interpretation takes the Arabic language itself as the starting point for understanding.



The central finding is that Ibn Taymiyyah does not represent a model for social interpretation; rather, his methodology stands in fundamental opposition to it.



Keywords: Social Interpretation - Ijtihadi Methodology - Ibn Taymiyyah - Tafsir bil-Ma'thur - Salafi Thought - Tafsir bil-Ra'y - The Arabic Language and Interpretation - Qur'anic Context - Isra'iliyyat - Interpretive Renewal - Islamic Renaissance.